Charge Detail Summary

File Number: Phar20/494P
Practitioner: Devinda Asoka Joseph Polonowita
Hearing Start Date:

Hearing End Date:

Hearing Town/City:
Hearing Location:
Charge Characteristics:

Drugs - dispensing inadequate/inappropriate (Established)

Failure to record

Additional Orders:

Name Suppression to Practitioner

Order for interim name suppression and any identifying details for the practitioner.

Application for permanent name suppression for the practitioner declined.


Name Suppression to Complainant and/or Patient and/or client

Order for interim name suppression and any identifying details for the patients or health consumers who are identified in the charge.

Permanent non-publication order for the names or identifying details of the patients identified in the charge, and/or named in the materials presented at the hearing.


Other Suppression Orders

Permanent non-publication of the evidence that was given by the practitioner at the hearing, including the affidavits that were produced.


Appeal Order:


Full Decision 1174Phar20494P.pdf

Appeal Decision:

Precis of Decision:


On 11 May 2021 the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal) considered a charge laid by a Professional Conduct Committee against Mr Devinda Polonowita, registered pharmacist of Auckland (the Pharmacist).

The charge alleged that during a period from February 2013 to December 2017, when he was working at a community pharmacy that he owned in the Auckland area, the Pharmacist:

  1. dispensed methadone to patients
  • inconsistent with prescriptions and dispensing instructions; 1(a), (c), (d), (f), (j)
  • who did not have a prescription; 1(b), (e), (f)
  • failed to observe a change in dispensing instructions; 1(g)
  • failed to liaise with the Hospital pharmacist before dispensing; 1(h)
  1. Between May 2017 and July 2017, failed to annotate the prescription numbers, strengths or the doses on methadone prescriptions for patients; 2(a), (b), (c).
  1. Between May 2017 and July 2017, failed to retain a complete record of methadone dispensing, including records of prescription numbers, the corresponding dose on the starting date, variations to doses, and correspondence from prescribers;
  1. Between March 2017 and December 2017, the Pharmacist dispensed clozapine
  1. on 9 occasions to an inactive patient;
  2. To the same patient when no satisfactory blood test results were available.
  3. Failed to monitor dispensing and follow up on that patient.

The alleged conduct either separately and/or cumulatively amounted to professional misconduct the Health Practitioner’s Competence Assurance Act 2003.


The hearing proceeded on an agreed summary of facts. The Pharmacist admitted the charge and accepted that he was guilty of professional misconduct.

The Tribunal found that the charge was established on each of its particulars. The Tribunal was satisfied that the Pharmacist’s acts and omissions cumulatively amounted to professional misconduct. In combination, the Pharmacist’s acts and omissions warranted sanction.


The Tribunal:

  • Censured the Pharmacist;
  • Fined the Pharmacist $6,000.00;
  • Imposed conditions on the Pharmacist;
  • Ordered the Pharmacist to pay costs of $36,000.00.

The Tribunal directed publication of its decision and a summary.